tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3867467970813012874.post3398667346209183029..comments2023-10-30T06:18:18.671-07:00Comments on Dogmatic Enigmatics: On The Minimal State and 'Heartlessness'Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01302611752231009233noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3867467970813012874.post-34330654605824360062010-05-31T22:51:25.277-07:002010-05-31T22:51:25.277-07:00Mitchell: I take anarchy seriously as an alternati...Mitchell: I take anarchy seriously as an alternative; I don't reject it out of hand. My defense of the necessity for a state-of-nature minimal state would be similar to the defense that Robert Nozick gives in 'Anarchy, State, Utopia'. That would be a whole blog post / essay unto itself though, but briefly: as I said in my blog, a person's rights end when they intrude on another person's rights. Anarchy has no means for assuring that a person's rights are ensured. That is it DOESN'T hold that someone's rights ever end. Which would have disastrous consequences and is not really the logical end point of state-of-nature theory.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01302611752231009233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3867467970813012874.post-34078471516905453372010-05-31T15:16:49.596-07:002010-05-31T15:16:49.596-07:00I followed just about everything well, up to the p...I followed just about everything well, up to the point where you said anarchy was even less tolerable. Why is anarchy intolerable?M.P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08041995680229510848noreply@blogger.com